HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/6/4471    most recent 00527.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Senot, P. Articles by McIntyre, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Senot, P. Articles by McIntyre, J.

Anticipating the Effects of Gravity When Intercepting Moving Objects: Differentiating Up and Down Based on Nonvisual Cues

¹Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique—Collège de France, Paris, France; ²Dipartimento di Fisiologia Neuromotoria, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia; and ³Dipartimento di Neuroscienze and ⁴Centro di Bio-Medicina Spaziale, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Submitted 20 May 2005; accepted in final form 18 August 2005

Intercepting an object requires a precise estimate of its time of arrival at the interception point (time to contact or "TTC"). It has been proposed that knowledge about gravitational acceleration can be combined with first-order, visual-field information to provide a better estimate of TTC when catching falling objects. In this experiment, we investigated the relative role of visual and nonvisual information on motor-response timing in an interceptive task. Subjects were immersed in a stereoscopic virtual environment and asked to intercept with a virtual racket a ball falling from above or rising from below. The ball moved with different initial velocities and could accelerate, decelerate, or move at a constant speed. Depending on the direction of motion, the acceleration or deceleration of the ball could therefore be congruent or not with the acceleration that would be expected due to the force of gravity acting on the ball. Although the best success rate was observed for balls moving at a constant velocity, we systematically found a cross-effect of ball direction and acceleration on success rate and response timing. Racket motion was triggered on average 25 ms earlier when the ball fell from above than when it rose from below, whatever the ball's true acceleration. As visual-flow information was the same in both cases, this shift indicates an influence of the ball's direction relative to gravity on response timing, consistent with the anticipation of the effects of gravity on the flight of the ball.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. L. Miller, V. Maffei, G. Bosco, M. Iosa, M. Zago, E. Macaluso, and F. Lacquaniti Vestibular Nuclei and Cerebellum Put Visual Gravitational Motion in Context J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1969 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]