HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/6/4520    most recent 00067.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stokes, M. G. Articles by Mattingley, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stokes, M. G. Articles by Mattingley, J. B.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Simple Metric For Scaling Motor Threshold Based on Scalp-Cortex Distance: Application to Studies Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Submitted 20 January 2005; accepted in final form 30 August 2005

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a unique method in neuroscience used to stimulate focal regions of the human brain. As TMS gains popularity in experimental and clinical domains, techniques for controlling the extent of brain stimulation are becoming increasingly important. At present, TMS intensity is typically calibrated to the excitability of the human motor cortex, a measure referred to as motor threshold (MT). Although TMS is commonly applied to nonmotor regions, most applications do not consider the effect of changes in distance between the stimulating device and underlying neural tissue. Here we show that for every millimeter from the stimulating coil, an additional 3% of TMS output is required to induce an equivalent level of brain stimulation at the motor cortex. This abrupt spatial gradient will have crucial consequences when TMS is applied to nonmotor regions because of substantial variance in scalp-cortex distances over different regions of the head. Stimulation protocols that do not account for cortical distance therefore risk substantial under- or overstimulation. We describe a simple method for adjusting MT to account for variations in cortical distance, thus providing a more accurate calibration than unadjusted MT for the safe and effective application of TMS in clinical and experimental neuroscience.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Chambers, M. A. Bellgrove, I. C. Gould, T. English, H. Garavan, E. McNaught, M. Kamke, and J. B. Mattingley Dissociable Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Prefrontal and Premotor Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3638 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Feredoes, G. Tononi, and B. R. Postle The Neural Bases of the Short-Term Storage of Verbal Information Are Anatomically Variable across Individuals J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11003 - 11008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Del Olmo, B. Cheeran, G. Koch, and J. C. Rothwell Role of the Cerebellum in Externally Paced Rhythmic Finger Movements J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Morris, C. D. Chambers, and J. B. Mattingley Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements PNAS, May 22, 2007; 104(21): 9069 - 9074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]