HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/1/379    most recent 00498.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Victor, J. D. Articles by Sharpee, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Victor, J. D. Articles by Sharpee, T.

Responses of V1 Neurons to Two-Dimensional Hermite Functions

¹Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York; ²Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and ³Center for Molecular & Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey

Submitted 12 May 2005; accepted in final form 28 August 2005

Neurons in primary visual cortex are widely considered to be oriented filters or energy detectors that perform one-dimensional feature analysis. The main deviations from this picture are generally thought to include gain controls and modulatory influences. Here we investigate receptive field (RF) properties of single neurons with localized two-dimensional stimuli, the two-dimensional Hermite functions (TDHs). TDHs can be grouped into distinct complete orthonormal bases that are matched in contrast energy, spatial extent, and spatial frequency content but differ in two-dimensional form, and thus can be used to probe spatially specific nonlinearities. Here we use two such bases: Cartesian TDHs, which resemble vignetted gratings and checkerboards, and polar TDHs, which resemble vignetted annuli and dartboards. Of 63 isolated units, 51 responded to TDH stimuli. In 37/51 units, we found significant differences in overall response size (21/51) or apparent RF shape (28/51) that depended on which basis set was used. Because of the properties of the TDH stimuli, these findings are inconsistent with simple feedforward nonlinearities and with many variants of energy models. Rather, they imply the presence of nonlinearities that are not local in either space or spatial frequency. Units showing these differences were present to a similar degree in cat and monkey, in simple and complex cells, and in supragranular, infragranular, and granular layers. We thus find a widely distributed neurophysiological substrate for two-dimensional spatial analysis at the earliest stages of cortical processing. Moreover, the population pattern of tuning to TDH functions suggests that V1 neurons sample not only orientations, but a larger space of two-dimensional form, in an even-handed manner.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. E. Williams and R. M. Shapley A Dynamic Nonlinearity and Spatial Phase Specificity in Macaque V1 Neurons J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5706 - 5718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hegde and D. C. Van Essen A Comparative Study of Shape Representation in Macaque Visual Areas V2 and V4 Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1100 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]