| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Unit of Neural Network Physiology, Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and 2Krasnow Institute of Advanced Studies and School of Computational Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Submitted 29 July 2005; accepted in final form 13 October 2005
Striatal spiny projection (SP) neurons control movement initiation by integrating cortical inputs and inhibiting basal ganglia outputs. Central to this control lies a "microcircuit" that consists of a feedback pathway formed by axon collaterals between GABAergic SP neurons and a feedforward pathway from fast spiking (FS) GABAergic interneurons to SP neurons. Here, somatically evoked postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) and currents (PSCs) were compared for both pathways with dual whole cell patch recording in voltage- and current-clamp mode using cortex-striatum-substantia nigra organotypic cultures. On average, feedforward inputs were 1 ms earlier, more reliable, and about twice as large in amplitude compared with most feedback inputs. On the other hand, both pathways exhibited widely varying, partially overlapping amplitude distributions. This variability was already established for single FS neurons targeting many SP neurons. In response to precisely timed action potential bursts, feedforward and feedback inputs consistently showed short-term depression 
50–70% in voltage-clamp, although feedback inputs also displayed strong augmentation in current-clamp in line with previous reports. The augmentation of feedback inputs was absent in gramicidin D perforated-patch recording, which also showed the natural reversal potential for both inputs to be near firing threshold. Preceding depolarizing feedback inputs during the down state did not consistently change subsequent postsynaptic action potentials. We conclude that feedback and feedforward inputs have their dominant effect during the up-state. The reversal potential close to the up-state potential, which supports shunting operation with millisecond precision and the strong synaptic depression, should enable both pathways to carry time-critical information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Rossi, V. De Chiara, A. Musella, H. Kusayanagi, G. Mataluni, G. Bernardi, A. Usiello, and D. Centonze Chronic Psychoemotional Stress Impairs Cannabinoid-Receptor-Mediated Control of GABA Transmission in the Striatum J. Neurosci., July 16, 2008; 28(29): 7284 - 7292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Taverna, E. Ilijic, and D. J. Surmeier Recurrent Collateral Connections of Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons Are Disrupted in Models of Parkinson's Disease J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5504 - 5512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Darbin and T. Wichmann Effects of Striatal GABAA-Receptor Blockade on Striatal and Cortical Activity in Monkeys J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1294 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Centonze, S. Rossi, I. Napoli, V. Mercaldo, C. Lacoux, F. Ferrari, M. T. Ciotti, V. De Chiara, C. Prosperetti, M. Maccarrone, et al. The Brain Cytoplasmic RNA BC1 Regulates Dopamine D2 Receptor-Mediated Transmission in the Striatum J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8885 - 8892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Tecuapetla, L. Carrillo-Reid, J. Bargas, and E. Galarraga Dopaminergic modulation of short-term synaptic plasticity at striatal inhibitory synapses PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10258 - 10263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
