HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1410    most recent 01144.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kiemel, T. Articles by Jeka, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kiemel, T. Articles by Jeka, J. J.

Slow Dynamics of Postural Sway Are in the Feedback Loop

¹Departments of Kinesiology and ²Biology, ³Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

Submitted 5 November 2005; accepted in final form 18 September 2005

Postural sway is considered to have two fundamental stochastic components, a slow nonoscillatory component and a faster damped-oscillatory component. The slow component has been shown to account for the majority of sway variance during quiet stance. Postural control is generally viewed as a feedback loop in which sway is detected by sensory systems and appropriate motor commands are generated to stabilize the body's orientation. Whereas the mechanistic source for the damped-oscillatory sway component is most likely feedback control of an inverted pendulum, the underlying basis for the slow component is less clear. We investigated whether the slow process was inside or outside the feedback loop by providing standing subjects with sum-of-sines visual motion. Linear stochastic models were fit to the experimental sway trajectories to determine the stochastic structure of sway as well as the transfer function from visual motion to sway. The results supported a fifth-order stochastic model, consisting of a slow process and two damped-oscillatory components. Importantly, the slow process was determined to be inside the feedback loop. This supports the hypothesis that the slow component is due to errors in state estimation because state estimation is inside the feedback loop rather than a moving reference point or an exploratory process outside the feedback loop.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. D. Loram, M. Lakie, and P. J. Gawthrop Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control? J. Physiol., March 15, 2009; 587(6): 1343 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kiemel, A. J. Elahi, and J. J. Jeka Identification of the Plant for Upright Stance in Humans: Multiple Movement Patterns From a Single Neural Strategy J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3394 - 3406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. van der Kooij and E. de Vlugt Postural Responses Evoked by Platform Pertubations Are Dominated by Continuous Feedback J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 730 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]