HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1442    most recent 00483.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mahns, D. A. Articles by Rowe, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mahns, D. A. Articles by Rowe, M. J.

Vibrotactile Frequency Discrimination in Human Hairy Skin

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Submitted 11 May 2005; accepted in final form 23 November 2005

The human capacity for vibrotactile frequency discrimination has been compared directly for glabrous and hairy skin regions by means of a two-alternative, forced-choice psychophysical procedure in five subjects. Sinusoidal vibratory stimuli, delivered by means of a 4-mm-diam probe, were first used to obtain detection threshold values for the two skin sites, the finger tip and the dorsal forearm, at four standard frequencies, 20, 50, 100, and 200 Hz. Values confirmed previous results showing detection thresholds were markedly higher on hairy skin than on glabrous skin. For the discrimination task, each standard frequency, at an amplitude four times detection threshold, was paired with a series of comparison frequencies, and discrimination capacity then was quantified by deriving from psychometric function curves, measures of the discriminable frequency increment () and the Weber Fraction (/), which, when plotted as a function of the four standard frequencies, revealed similar capacities for frequency discrimination at the two skin sites at the standard frequencies of 20, 100, and 200 Hz but an equivocal difference at 50 Hz. Cutaneous local anesthesia produced a marked impairment in vibrotactile detection and discrimination at the low standard frequencies of 20 and 50 Hz but little effect at higher frequencies. In summary, the results reveal, first, a striking similarity in vibrotactile discriminative performance in hairy and glabrous skin despite marked differences in detection thresholds for the two sites, and, second, the results confirm that vibrotactile detection and discrimination in hairy skin depend on superficial receptors at low frequencies but depend on deep, probably Pacinian corpuscle, receptors for high frequencies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Deco, L. Scarano, and S. Soto-Faraco Weber's Law in Decision Making: Integrating Behavioral Data in Humans with a Neurophysiological Model J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11192 - 11200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Harris, E. Arabzadeh, C. A. Moore, and C. W. G. Clifford Noninformative Vision Causes Adaptive Changes in Tactile Sensitivity J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7136 - 7140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Sahai, D. A. Mahns, L. Robinson, N. M. Perkins, G. T. Coleman, and M. J. Rowe Processing of Vibrotactile Inputs From Hairy Skin by Neurons of the Dorsal Column Nuclei in the Cat J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1451 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]