HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1771    most recent 00877.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O.

SA1 and RA Afferent Responses to Static and Vibrating Gratings

¹Mind Brain Institute and ²Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and ³Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

Submitted 19 August 2005; accepted in final form 17 October 2005

SA1 and RA afferent fibers differ both in their ability to convey information about the fine spatial structure of tactile stimuli and in their frequency sensitivity profiles. In the present study, we investigated the extent to which the spatial resolution of the signal conveyed by SA1 and RA fibers depends on the temporal properties of the stimulus. To that end, we recorded the responses evoked in SA1 and RA fibers of macaques by static and vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period, vibratory frequency, and amplitude. Gratings were oriented either parallel to the long axis of the finger (vertical) or perpendicular to it (horizontal). We examined the degree to which afferent responses were dependent on the spatial period, vibratory frequency, amplitude, and orientation of the gratings. We found that the spatial modulation of the afferent responses increased as the spatial period of the gratings increased; the spatial modulation was the same for static and vibrating gratings, despite large differences in evoked spike rates; the spatial modulation in SA1 responses was independent of stimulus amplitude over the range of amplitudes tested, whereas RA modulation decreased slightly as the stimulus amplitude increased; vertical gratings evoked stronger and more highly modulated responses than horizontal gratings; the modulation in SA1 responses was higher than that in RA responses at all frequencies and amplitudes. The behavioral consequences of these neurophysiological findings are examined in a companion paper.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Bensmaia, P. V. Denchev, J. F. Dammann III, J. C. Craig, and S. S. Hsiao The Representation of Stimulus Orientation in the Early Stages of Somatosensory Processing J. Neurosci., January 16, 2008; 28(3): 776 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3852 - 3864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]