HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1783    most recent 00878.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O.

Temporal Factors in Tactile Spatial Acuity: Evidence for RA Interference in Fine Spatial Processing

¹Mind Brain Institute and ²Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and ³Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

Submitted 19 August 2005; accepted in final form 17 October 2005

We investigated the extent to which subjects’ ability to perceive the fine spatial structure of a stimulus depends on its temporal properties (namely the frequency at which it vibrates). Subjects were presented with static or vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period (1–8 mm) and vibratory frequency (5–80 Hz) and judged the orientation of the gratings, presented either parallel or perpendicular to the long axis of the finger. We found that the grating orientation threshold (GOT)—the spatial period at which subjects can reliably discriminate the orientation of the grating—increased as the vibratory frequency of the gratings increased. As the spatial modulation of SA1 and RA afferent fibers has been found to be independent of vibratory frequency, the frequency dependence of spatial acuity cannot be attributed to changes in the quality of the peripheral signal. Furthermore, we found GOTs to be relatively independent of stimulus amplitude, so the low spatial acuity at high flutter frequencies does not appear to be due to an inadequacy in the strength of the afferent response at those frequencies. We hypothesized that the RA signal, the strength of which increases with vibratory frequency, interfered with the spatially modulated signal conveyed by SA1 fibers. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that adapting RA afferent fibers improved spatial acuity, as gauged by GOTs, at the high flutter frequencies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Bensmaia, P. V. Denchev, J. F. Dammann III, J. C. Craig, and S. S. Hsiao The Representation of Stimulus Orientation in the Early Stages of Somatosensory Processing J. Neurosci., January 16, 2008; 28(3): 776 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]