JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 1897-1907, 2006. First published December 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00625.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1897    most recent
00625.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.

Temporal Nonlinearity During Recovery From Sequential Inhibition by Neurons in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex

Kyle T. Nakamoto2, Jiping Zhang1,3 and Leonard M. Kitzes1,2

1Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology and 2 Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, California; and 3Department of Biology, School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Submitted 16 June 2005; accepted in final form 2 December 2005

Auditory stimuli occur most often in sequences rather than in isolation. It is therefore necessary to understand how responses to sounds occurring in sequences differ from responses to isolated sounds. Cells in primary auditory cortex (AI) respond to a large set of binaural stimuli when presented in isolation. The set of responses to such stimuli presented at one frequency comprises a level response area. A preceding binaural stimulus can reduce the size and magnitude of level response areas of AI cells. The present study focuses on the effects of the time interval between a preceding stimulus and the stimuli of a level response area in pentobarbital-anesthetized cats. After the offset of a preceding stimulus, the ability of AI cells to respond to succeeding stimuli varies dynamically in time. At short interstimulus intervals (ISI), a preceding stimulus can completely inhibit responses to succeeding stimuli. With increasing ISIs, AI cells respond first to binaural stimuli that evoke the largest responses in the control condition, i.e., not preceded by a stimulus. Recovery rate is nonlinear across the level response area; responses to these most-effective stimuli recover to 70% of control on average 187 ms before responses to other stimuli recover to 70% of their control sizes. During the tens to hundreds of milliseconds that a level response area is reduced in size and magnitude, the selectivity of AI cells is increased for stimuli that evoke the largest responses. This increased selectivity results from a temporal nonlinearity in the recovery of the level response area which protects responses to the most effective binaural stimuli. Thus in a sequence of effective stimuli, a given cell will respond selectively to only those stimuli that evoke a strong response when presented alone.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. M. Kitzes, Dept. of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-1275 (E-mail: lmkitzes{at}uci.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. Nelson, Z. M. Smith, and E. D. Young
Wide-Dynamic-Range Forward Suppression in Marmoset Inferior Colliculus Neurons Is Generated Centrally and Accounts for Perceptual Masking
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2553 - 2562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Scholl, X. Gao, and M. Wehr
Level Dependence of Contextual Modulation in Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1616 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.