HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/3/1926    most recent 00497.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, L.-F. Articles by Wallace, M. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liu, L.-F. Articles by Wallace, M. N.

Phase-Locked Responses to Pure Tones in the Inferior Colliculus

MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Submitted 12 May 2005; accepted in final form 6 December 2005

In the auditory system, some ascending pathways preserve the precise timing information present in a temporal code of frequency. This can be measured by studying responses that are phase-locked to the stimulus waveform. At each stage along a pathway, there is a reduction in the upper frequency limit of the phase-locking and an increase in the steady-state latency. In the guinea pig, phase-locked responses to pure tones have been described at various levels from auditory nerve to neocortex but not in the inferior colliculus (IC). Therefore we made recordings from 161 single units in guinea pig IC. Of these single units, 68% (110/161) showed phase-locked responses. Cells that phase-locked were mainly located in the central nucleus but also occurred in the dorsal cortex and external nucleus. The upper limiting frequency of phase-locking varied greatly between units (80–1,034 Hz) and between anatomical divisions. The upper limits in the three divisions were central nucleus, >1,000 Hz; dorsal cortex, 700 Hz; external nucleus, 320 Hz. The mean latencies also varied and were central nucleus, 8.2 ± 2.8 (SD) ms; dorsal cortex, 17.2 ms; external nucleus, 13.3 ms. We conclude that many cells in the central nucleus receive direct inputs from the brain stem, whereas cells in the external and dorsal divisions receive input from other structures that may include the forebrain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Middlebrooks Cochlear-Implant High Pulse Rate and Narrow Electrode Configuration Impair Transmission of Temporal Information to the Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 92 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kondgen, C. Geisler, S. Fusi, X.-J. Wang, H.-R. Luscher, and M. Giugliano The Dynamical Response Properties of Neocortical Neurons to Temporally Modulated Noisy Inputs In Vitro Cereb Cortex, February 9, 2008; (2008) bhm235v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Wallace, L. A. Anderson, and A. R. Palmer Phase-Locked Responses to Pure Tones in the Auditory Thalamus J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1941 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Christianson and J. L. Pena Preservation of Spectrotemporal Tuning Between the Nucleus Laminaris and the Inferior Colliculus of the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3544 - 3553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]