JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 2541-2552, 2006. First published December 14, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00891.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/2541    most recent
00891.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rokem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samengo, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rokem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samengo, I.

Spike-Timing Precision Underlies the Coding Efficiency of Auditory Receptor Neurons

Ariel Rokem, Sebastian Watzl, Tim Gollisch, Martin Stemmler, Andreas V. M. Herz and Inés Samengo

Institute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt University, and Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany

Submitted 25 August 2005; accepted in final form 2 December 2005

Sensory systems must translate incoming signals quickly and reliably so that an animal can act successfully in its environment. Even at the level of receptor neurons, however, functional aspects of the sensory encoding process are not yet fully understood. Specifically, this concerns the question how stimulus features and neural response characteristics lead to an efficient transmission of sensory information. To address this issue, we have recorded and analyzed spike trains from grasshopper auditory receptors, while systematically varying the stimulus statistics. The stimulus variations profoundly influenced the efficiency of neural encoding. This influence was largely attributable to the presence of specific stimulus features that triggered remarkably precise spikes whose trial-to-trial timing variability was as low as 0.15 ms—one order of magnitude shorter than typical stimulus time scales. Precise spikes decreased the noise entropy of the spike trains, thereby increasing the rate of information transmission. In contrast, the total spike train entropy, which quantifies the variety of different spike train patterns, hardly changed when stimulus conditions were altered, as long as the neural firing rate remained the same. This finding shows that stimulus distributions that were transmitted with high information rates did not invoke additional response patterns, but instead displayed exceptional temporal precision in their neural representation. The acoustic stimuli that led to the highest information rates and smallest spike-time jitter feature pronounced sound-pressure deflections lasting for 2–3 ms. These upstrokes are reminiscent of salient structures found in natural grasshopper communication signals, suggesting that precise spikes selectively encode particularly important aspects of the natural stimulus environment.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. Samengo, Centro Atómico Bariloche, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Montemurro, S. Panzeri, M. Maravall, A. Alenda, M. R. Bale, M. Brambilla, and R. S. Petersen
Role of Precise Spike Timing in Coding of Dynamic Vibrissa Stimuli in Somatosensory Thalamus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1871 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio, C. P. Billimoria, and B. Ch. Ludwar
Information Rate and Spike-Timing Precision of Proprioceptive Afferents
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1706 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Avissar, A. C. Furman, J. C. Saunders, and T. D. Parsons
Adaptation Reduces Spike-Count Reliability, But Not Spike-Timing Precision, of Auditory Nerve Responses
J. Neurosci., June 13, 2007; 27(24): 6461 - 6472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Vogel and B. Ronacher
Neural Correlations Increase Between Consecutive Processing Levels in the Auditory System of Locusts
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3376 - 3385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Wohlgemuth and B. Ronacher
Auditory Discrimination of Amplitude Modulations Based on Metric Distances of Spike Trains
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3082 - 3092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. P. Billimoria, R. A. DiCaprio, J. T. Birmingham, L. F. Abbott, and E. Marder
Neuromodulation of spike-timing precision in sensory neurons.
J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 5910 - 5919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.