| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Center for Neural Science and 2Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York; and 3Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Biomedical Research Institute, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
Submitted 18 July 2005; accepted in final form 10 January 2006
Brief synaptic inhibition can overwhelm a nearly coincident suprathreshold excitatory input to preclude spike generation. Surprisingly, a brief inhibitory event that occurs in a favorable time window preceding an otherwise subthreshold excitation can facilitate spiking. Such postinhibitory facilitation (PIF) requires that the inhibition has a short (decay) time constant 
inh. The timescale ranges of inh and of the window (width and timing) for PIF depend on the rates of neuronal subthreshold dynamics. The mechanism for PIF is general, involving reduction by hyperpolarization of some excitability-suppressing factor that is partially recruited at rest. Here we illustrate and analyze PIF, experimentally and theoretically, using brain stem auditory neurons and a conductance-based five-variable model. In this auditory case, PIF timescales are in the sub- to few millisecond range and the primary mechanistic factor is a low-threshold potassium conductance gKLT. Competing dynamic influences create the favorable time window: hyperpolarization that moves V away from threshold and hyperexcitability resulting from reduced gKLT. A two-variable reduced model that retains the dynamics only of V and gKLT displays a similar time window. We analyze this model in the phase plane; its geometry has generic features. Further generalizing, we show that PIF behavior may occur even in a very reduced model with linear subthreshold dynamics, by using an integrate-and-fire model with an accommodating voltage-dependent threshold. Our analyses of PIF provide insights for fast inhibition's facilitatory effects in longer trains. Periodic subthreshold excitatory inputs can lead to firing, even one for one, if brief inhibitory inputs are interleaved within a range of favorable phase lags. The temporal specificity of inhibition's facilitating effect could play a role in temporal processing, in sensitivity to inhibitory and excitatory temporal patterning, in the auditory and other neural systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. P. Agapiou and D. McAlpine Low-Frequency Envelope Sensitivity Produces Asymmetric Binaural Tuning Curves J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2381 - 2396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery Facilitatory Mechanisms Underlying Selectivity for the Direction and Rate of Frequency Modulated Sweeps in the Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., September 24, 2008; 28(39): 9806 - 9816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Peterson, S. Voytenko, D. Gans, A. Galazyuk, and J. Wenstrup Intracellular Recordings From Combination-Sensitive Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 629 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Sanchez, D. Gans, and J. J. Wenstrup Glycinergic "Inhibition" Mediates Selective Excitatory Responses to Combinations of Sounds J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 80 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. V. Chirila, K. C. Rowland, J. M. Thompson, and G. A. Spirou Development of gerbil medial superior olive: integration of temporally delayed excitation and inhibition at physiological temperature J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 167 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
