|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and 2Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistemistica, DEIS-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Submitted 18 August 2004; accepted in final form 4 February 2006
Humans maintain stable stance in a wide variety of environments. This robust behavior is thought to involve sensory reweighting whereby the nervous system adjusts the relative contribution of sensory sources used to control stance depending on environmental conditions. Based on prior experimental and modeling results, we developed a specific quantitative representation of a sensory reweighting hypothesis that predicts that a given reduction in the contribution from one sensory system will be accompanied by a corresponding increase in the contribution from different sensory systems. The goal of this study was to test this sensory-reweighting hypothesis using measures that quantitatively assess the relative contributions of the proprioceptive and graviceptive (vestibular) systems to postural control during eyes-closed stance in different test conditions. Medial/lateral body sway was evoked by side-to-side rotation of the support surface (SS) while simultaneously delivering a pulsed galvanic vestibular stimulus (GVS) through electrodes behind the ears. A model-based interpretation of sway evoked by SS rotations provided estimates of the proprioceptive weighting factor, Wp, and showed that Wp declined with increasing SS amplitude. If the sensory-reweighting hypothesis is true, then the decline in Wp should be accompanied by a corresponding increase in Wg, the graviceptive weighting factor, and responses to the GVS should increase in proportion to the value of Wg derived from responses to SS rotations. Results were consistent with the predictions of the proposed sensory-reweighting hypothesis. GVS-evoked sway increased with increasing SS amplitude, and Wg measures derived from responses to GVS and from responses to SS rotations were highly correlated.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Goodworth and R. J. Peterka Contribution of Sensorimotor Integration to Spinal Stabilization in Humans J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 496 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Masani, A. H. Vette, N. Kawashima, and M. R. Popovic Neuromusculoskeletal Torque-Generation Process Has a Large Destabilizing Effect on the Control Mechanism of Quiet Standing J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1465 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schmid, A. Nardone, A. M. De Nunzio, M. Schmid, and M. Schieppati Equilibrium during static and dynamic tasks in blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal plasticity Brain, August 1, 2007; 130(8): 2097 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Day and M. Guerraz Feedforward versus feedback modulation of human vestibular-evoked balance responses by visual self-motion information J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 153 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lakie and I. D. Loram Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 403 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |