JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 95: 3146-3153, 2006. First published February 8, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01184.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/3146    most recent
01184.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, R.H.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, R.H.S.

Task Switching as a Two-Stage Decision Process

N. Sinha, J.T.G. Brown and R.H.S. Carpenter

The Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Submitted 8 November 2005; accepted in final form 31 January 2006

Saccades represent decisions, and the study of their latency has led to a neurally plausible model of the underlying mechanisms, LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate), that can successfully predict reaction time behavior in simple decision tasks, with fixed instructions. However, if the instructions abruptly change, we have a more complex situation, known as task switching. Psychologists' explanations of the phenomena of task switching have so far tended to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and not intended to relate particularly clearly to existing models of decision making or to likely neural implementations. Here, we investigated task switching using a novel saccadic task: we presented the instructions by stimulus elements identical to those of the task itself, allowing us to compare decisions about instructions with decisions in the actual task. Our results support a relatively simple model consisting of two distinct LATER processes in series: the first detects the instruction, the second implements it.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R.H.S. Carpenter, The Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK (E-mail: rhsc1{at}cam.ac.uk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Oswal, M. Ogden, and R.H.S. Carpenter
The Time Course of Stimulus Expectation in a Saccadic Decision Task
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2722 - 2730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.