HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 95/6/3496    most recent 01187.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (34) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gonzalez, C. L. R. Articles by Goodale, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gonzalez, C. L. R. Articles by Goodale, M. A.

Hemispheric Specialization for the Visual Control of Action Is Independent of Handedness

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group on Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

Submitted 9 November 2005; accepted in final form 20 February 2006

The idea that visually guided action is independent of visual perception has been supported by neurological, neuropsychological, and behavioral studies. In healthy subjects, evidence for this distinction has come from psychophysical studies of the effects of visual illusions on perceptual judgments and object-directed grasping. This evidence is limited, however, by the fact that virtually all studies have involved right-handed subjects using their dominant hand, which is presumably controlled by the left hemisphere. There is tentative evidence from earlier neurological studies that the left hemisphere may in fact play a special role in the integration of visual and motor information during grasping. We designed two experiments to test this idea. The first experiment involved pictorial illusions, which are known to have robust effects on perceptual judgments but little influence on grasping. Right- and left-handed subjects reached out and grasped objects embedded in two different visual illusions with either their dominant or their nondominant hand. For both right- and left-handed subjects, precision grasping with the left hand, but not with the right, was affected by the illusions. In a follow-up experiment, we examined precision grasping in a more natural setting and showed that left-handed subjects use their nondominant (right) hand significantly more as compared with right-handed subjects. We conclude that visuomotor mechanisms encapsulated in the left hemisphere play a crucial role in the visual control of action and that this hemispheric specialization evolved independently of handedness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Kroliczak, C. Cavina-Pratesi, D. A. Goodman, and J. C. Culham What Does the Brain Do When You Fake It? An fMRI Study of Pantomimed and Real Grasping J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2410 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Goble Validity of using reaction time as a basis for determining motor laterality J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1868 - 1868. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Derakhshan Laterality of the command center in relation to handedness and simple reaction time: a clinical perspective J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3556 - 3556. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. R. Gonzalez, M. A. Goodale, CHR Group on Action and Perception, and T. Ganel Reply J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3557 - 3557. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Shmuelof and E. Zohary A mirror representation of others' actions in the human anterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci., September 20, 2006; 26(38): 9736 - 9742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]