HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Spitzer, M. W. Articles by Takahashi, T. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spitzer, M. W. Articles by Takahashi, T. T.

Sound Localization by Barn Owls in a Simulated Echoic Environment

Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon

Submitted 19 September 2005; accepted in final form 18 January 2006

We examined the accuracy and precision with which the barn owl (Tyto alba) turns its head toward sound sources under conditions that evoke the precedence effect (PE) in humans. Stimuli consisted of 25-ms noise bursts emitted from two sources, separated horizontally by 40°, and temporally by 3–50 ms. At delays from 3 to 10 ms, head turns were always directed at the leading source, and were nearly as accurate and precise as turns toward single sources, indicating that the leading source dominates perception. This lead dominance is particularly remarkable, first, because on some trials, the lagging source was significantly higher in amplitude than the lead, arising from the directionality of the owl's ears, and second, because the temporal overlap of the two sounds can degrade the binaural cues with which the owl localizes sounds. With increasing delays, the influence of the lagging source became apparent as the head saccades became increasingly biased toward the lagging source. Furthermore, on some of the trials at delays 20 ms, the owl turned its head, first, in the direction of one source, and then the other, suggesting that it was able to resolve two separately localizable sources. At all delays <50 ms, response latencies were longer for paired sources than for single sources. With the possible exception of response latency, these findings demonstrate that the owl exhibits precedence phenomena in sound localization similar to those in humans and cats, and provide a basis for comparison with neurophysiological data.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Dent, D. J. Tollin, and T. C. T. Yin Influence of Sound Source Location on the Behavior and Physiology of the Precedence Effect in Cats J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 724 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Lee, D. O. Elias, and A. C. Mason A precedence effect resolves phantom sound source illusions in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea PNAS, April 14, 2009; 106(15): 6357 - 6362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Du, J. Li, X. Wu, and L. Li Precedence-effect-induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition in socially reared but not isolation-reared rats Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 44 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]