JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 451-460, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01277.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Islam, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Deliagina, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Islam, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Deliagina, T. G.

Pattern of Motor Coordination Underlying Backward Swimming in the Lamprey

Salma S. Islam, Pavel V. Zelenin, Grigori N. Orlovsky, Sten Grillner and Tatiana G. Deliagina

The Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Submitted 5 December 2005; accepted in final form 6 April 2006

The main form of locomotion in the lamprey (a lower vertebrate, cyclostome) is forward swimming (FS) based on periodical waves of lateral body flexion propagating from head to tail. The lamprey is also capable of backward swimming (BS). Here we describe the kinematical and electromyographic (EMG) pattern of BS, as well as the effects on this pattern exerted by different lesions of the spinal cord. The BS was evoked by tactile stimulation of a large area in the anterior part of the body. Swimming was attributed to the waves of lateral body undulations propagating from tail to head. The EMG bursts on the two sides alternated, and the EMG in more caudal segments led in phase the EMG in more rostral segments. Main kinematical characteristics of BS strongly differed from those of FS: the amplitude of undulations was much larger and their frequency lower. Also, the maintenance of the dorsal-side-up body orientation ascribed to vestibular postural reflexes (typical for FS) was not observed during BS. A complete transection of the spinal cord did not abolish the generation of forward-propagating waves rostral to the lesion. After a lateral hemisection of the spinal cord, the BS pattern persisted on both sides rostral to the lesion; caudal to the lesion, it was present on the intact side and reduced or abolished on the lesioned side. The role of the spinal cord in generation of different forms of undulatory locomotion (FS and BS) is discussed.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. G. Deliagina, The Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden (E-mail: Tatiana.Deliagina{at}neuro.ki.se)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. S. Islam and P. V. Zelenin
Modifications of Locomotor Pattern Underlying Escape Behavior in the Lamprey
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 297 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Karayannidou, P. V. Zelenin, G. N. Orlovsky, and T. G. Deliagina
Responses of Reticulospinal Neurons in the Lamprey to Lateral Turns
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 512 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.