JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 1011-1017, 2006. First published January 11, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01179.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1011    most recent
01179.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruno, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrone, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruno, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrone, M. C.

Development of Saccadic Suppression in Children

Aurelio Bruno1,2, Simona Maria Brambati3, Daniela Perani3,4,5 and Maria Concetta Morrone3,6

1Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy; 2University College London, Department of Psychology, London, United Kingdom; 3Università 4Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan; 5Istituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerca, Segrate Milan; Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Istituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerca, Pisa, Italy

Submitted 8 November 2005; accepted in final form 4 January 2006

We measured saccadic suppression in adolescent children and young adults using spatially curtailed low spatial frequency stimuli. For both groups, sensitivity for color-modulated stimuli was unchanged during saccades. Sensitivity for luminance-modulated stimuli was greatly reduced during saccades in both groups but far more for adolescents than for young adults. Adults' suppression was on average a factor of about 3, whereas that for the adolescent group was closer to a factor of 10. The specificity of the suppression to luminance-modulated stimuli excludes generic explanations such as task difficulty and attention. We suggest that the enhanced suppression in adolescents results from the immaturity of the ocular-motor system at that age.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. C. Morrone, Istituto di Neuroscienze, CNR, via G. Moruzzi 1, Pisa 56100, Italy (E-mail: concetta{at}in.cnr.it)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.