JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 1227-1236, 2006. First published July 12, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01170.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1227    most recent
01170.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butovas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butovas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, C.

Effects of Electrically Coupled Inhibitory Networks on Local Neuronal Responses to Intracortical Microstimulation

Sergejus Butovas1, Sheriar G. Hormuzdi2, Hannah Monyer2 and Cornelius Schwarz1

1Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Tübingen, Tübingen; and 2Department of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital of Neurology, Heidelberg, Germany

Submitted 4 November 2005; accepted in final form 15 May 2006

Using in vivo multielectrode electrophysiology in mice, we investigated the underpinnings of a local, long-lasting firing rate suppression evoked by intracortical microstimulation. Synaptic inhibition contributes to this suppression as it was reduced by pharmacological blockade of {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptors. Blockade of GABAB receptors also abolished the known sublinear addition of inhibitory response duration after repetitive electrical stimulation. Furthermore, evoked inhibition was weaker and longer in connexin 36 knockout (KO) mice that feature decoupled cortical inhibitory networks. In supragranular layers of KO mice even an unusually long excitatory response (≤50 ms) appeared that was never observed in wild-type (WT) mice. Furthermore, the spread and duration of very fast oscillations (>200 Hz) evoked by microstimulation at a short latency were strongly enhanced in KO mice. In the spatial domain, lack of connexin 36 unmasked a strong anisotropy of inhibitory spread. Although its reach along layers was almost the same as that in WT mice, the spread across cortical depth was severely hampered. In summary, the present data suggest that connexin 36–coupled networks significantly shape the electrically evoked cortical inhibitory response. Electrical coupling renders evoked cortical inhibition more precise and strong and ensures a uniform spread along the two cardinal axes of neocortical geometry.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Schwarz, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Tübingen, Otfried Müller Str. 27, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (E-mail: cornelius.schwarz{at}uni-tuebingen.de)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. L. Kimmel and T. Moore
Temporal Patterning of Saccadic Eye Movement Signals
J. Neurosci., July 18, 2007; 27(29): 7619 - 7630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.