HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 96/3/1420    most recent 00315.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McSorley, E. Articles by Walker, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McSorley, E. Articles by Walker, R.

Time Course of Oculomotor Inhibition Revealed by Saccade Trajectory Modulation

¹Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading; ²Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London; and ³Department of Psychology, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom

Submitted 24 March 2006; accepted in final form 10 April 2006

Selecting a stimulus as the target for a goal-directed movement involves inhibiting other competing possible responses. Both target and distractor stimuli activate populations of neurons in topographic oculomotor maps such as the superior colliculus. Local inhibitory interconnections between these populations ensure only one saccade target is selected. Suppressing saccades to distractors may additionally involve inhibiting corresponding map regions to bias the local competition. Behavioral evidence of these inhibitory processes comes from the effects of distractors on oculomotor and manual trajectories. Individual saccades may initially deviate either toward or away from a distractor, but the source of this variability has not been investigated. Here we investigate the relation between distractor-related deviation of trajectory and saccade latency. Targets were presented with, or without, distractors, and the deviation of saccade trajectories arising from the presence of distractors was measured. A fixation gap paradigm was used to manipulate latency independently of the influence of competing distractors. Shorter-latency saccades deviated toward distractors and longer-latency saccades deviated away from distractors. The transition between deviation toward or away from distractors occurred at a saccade latency of around 200 ms. This shows that the time course of the inhibitory process involved in distractor related suppression is relatively slow.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mulckhuyse, S. Van der Stigchel, and J. Theeuwes Early and Late Modulation of Saccade Deviations by Target Distractor Similarity J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1451 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Harwood and J. P. Herman Optimally Straight and Optimally Curved Saccades J. Neurosci., July 23, 2008; 28(30): 7455 - 7457. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. McPeek Incomplete Suppression of Distractor-Related Activity in the Frontal Eye Field Results in Curved Saccades J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2699 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]