HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 96/3/1664    most recent 00214.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chapman, C. E. Articles by Beauchamp, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chapman, C. E. Articles by Beauchamp, E.

REPORT

Differential Controls Over Tactile Detection in Humans by Motor Commands and Peripheral Reafference

Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central, Département de Physiologie, and École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Submitted 28 February 2006; accepted in final form 7 June 2006

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which motor commands and peripheral reafference differentially control the detection of near-threshold, tactile stimuli. Detection of weak electrical stimuli applied to the index finger (D2) was evaluated with two bias-free measures of sensory detection, the index of detectability (d') and the proportion of stimuli detected. Stimuli were presented at different delays prior to and during two motor tasks, D2 abduction, and elbow extension; both tasks were tested in two modes, active and passive. For both active tasks, the peak decrease in tactile suppression occurred at the onset of electromyographic activity. The time course for the suppression of detection during active and passive D2 abduction was identical, and preceded the onset of movement (respectively, –35 and –47 ms). These results suggest that movement reafference alone, acting through a mechanism of backward masking, could explain the modulation seen with D2 movement. In contrast, tactile suppression was significantly earlier for active elbow movements (–59 ms) as compared with passive (–21 ms), an observation consistent with both the motor command and peripheral reafference contributing to the suppression of detection of stimuli applied to D2 during movements about a proximal joint. A role for the motor command in tactile gating during distal movements cannot be discounted, however, because differences in the strength and distribution of the peripheral reafference may also have contributed to the proximo-distal differences in the timing of the suppression.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Seki, S. I. Perlmutter, and E. E. Fetz Task-Dependent Modulation of Primary Afferent Depolarization in Cervical Spinal Cord of Monkeys Performing an Instructed Delay Task J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 85 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Green Temperature perception on the hand during static versus dynamic contact with a surface Atten Percept Psychophys, July 1, 2009; 71(5): 1185 - 1196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Costa, J. Valls-Sole, F. Valldeoriola, and J. Rumia Subcortical Interactions Between Somatosensory Stimuli of Different Modalities and Their Temporal Profile J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1610 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]