HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 96/4/1838    most recent 00170.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grewe, J. Articles by Warzecha, A.-K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grewe, J. Articles by Warzecha, A.-K.

Implications of Functionally Different Synaptic Inputs for Neuronal Gain and Computational Properties of Fly Visual Interneurons

¹Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld; and ²Psychologisches Institut II, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany

Submitted 16 February 2006; accepted in final form 16 June 2006

Neurons embedded in networks are thought to receive synaptic inputs that do not drive them on their own, but modulate the responsiveness to driving input. Although studies on brain slices have led to detailed knowledge of how nondriving input affects dendritic integration, its origin and functional implications remain unclear. We tackle this issue using an ensemble of fly wide-field visual interneurons. These neurons offer the opportunity not only to combine in vivo recording techniques and natural sensory stimulation but also to interpret electrophysiological results in a behavioral context. By targeted manipulation of the animal's visual input we find a pronounced modulating impact of nondriving input, whereas functionally important cellular properties like direction tuning and the coding of pattern velocity are left almost unaffected. We propose that the integration of functionally different synaptic inputs is a mechanism that immanently equalizes the ensemble's sensitivity irrespective of the specific stimulus conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Rosner, M. Egelhaaf, J. Grewe, and A. K. Warzecha Variability of blowfly head optomotor responses J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2009; 212(8): 1170 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Medan, D. Oliva, and D. Tomsic Characterization of Lobula Giant Neurons Responsive to Visual Stimuli That Elicit Escape Behaviors in the Crab Chasmagnathus J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2414 - 2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]