JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 2139-2143, 2006. First published June 14, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00243.2006
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/2139    most recent
00243.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frerking, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohliger-Frerking, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frerking, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohliger-Frerking, P.

REPORT

Functional Consequences of Presynaptic Inhibition During Behaviorally Relevant Activity

M. Frerking and P. Ohliger-Frerking

Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon

Submitted 7 March 2006; accepted in final form 30 May 2006

Presynaptic inhibition is a widespread mechanism for regulating transmitter release in the CNS. Presynaptic inhibitors act as a high-pass filter, but the functional consequence of this filtering during the synaptic processing of behaviorally relevant activity remains unknown. Here we use analytical approaches to examine the effects of presynaptic inhibition on synaptic output in response to activity patterns from CA3 pyramidal cells during the performance of a complex behavioral task. We calculate that presynaptic inhibition enhances the contrast between background activity and responses to environmental cues and that neuronal responses to location are subject to stronger contrast enhancement than neuronal responses to olfactory information. Our analysis suggests that presynaptic inhibition also enhances the importance of integrative inputs that respond to many behavioral cues during the task at the expense of specific inputs that respond to only a few of these cues.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Frerking, Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006 (E-mail: frerking{at}ohsu.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. M. Roloff and S. A. Thayer
Modulation of Excitatory Synaptic Transmission by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Switches from Agonist to Antagonist Depending on Firing Rate
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2009; 75(4): 892 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Meunier, J. Kwon, H. Russmann, S. Ravindran, R. Mazzocchio, and L. Cohen
Spinal use-dependent plasticity of synaptic transmission in humans after a single cycling session
J. Physiol., March 1, 2007; 579(2): 375 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.