JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 2549-2563, 2006. First published August 2, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00704.2006
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2549    most recent
00704.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canavier, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Landry, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canavier, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Landry, R. S.

An Increase in AMPA and a Decrease in SK Conductance Increase Burst Firing by Different Mechanisms in a Model of a Dopamine Neuron In Vivo

C. C. Canavier1,2 and R. S. Landry3

1Neuroscience Center of Excellence, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; and 3Department of Physics, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana

Submitted 7 July 2006; accepted in final form 29 July 2006

A stylized, symmetric, compartmental model of a dopamine neuron in vivo shows how rate and pattern can be modulated either concurrently or differentially. If two or more parameters in the model are varied concurrently, the baseline firing rate and the extent of bursting become de-correlated, which provides an explanation for the lack of a tight correlation in vivo and is consistent with some independence of the mechanisms that generate baseline firing rates versus bursts. We hypothesize that most bursts are triggered by a barrage of synaptic input and that particularly meaningful stimuli recruit larger numbers of synapses in a more synchronous way. An example of concurrent modulation is that increasing the short-lived AMPA current evokes additional spikes without regard to pattern, producing comparable increases in spike frequency and fraction fired in bursts. On the other hand, blocking the SK current evokes additional bursts by allowing a depolarization that previously produced only a single spike to elicit two or more and elongates existing bursts by the same principle, resulting in a greater effect on pattern than rate. A probabilistic algorithm for the random insertion of spikes into the firing pattern produces a good approximation to the pattern changes induced by increasing the AMPA conductance, but not by blocking the SK current, consistent with a differential modulation in the latter case. Furthermore, blocking SK produced a longer burst with a greater intra-burst frequency in response to a simulated meaningful input, suggesting that reduction of this current may augment reward-related responses.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. C. Canavier, Neuroscience Center of Excellence, LSU Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier St., Suite D, New Orleans, LA 70112 (E-mail: ccanav{at}lsuhsc.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Migliore, C. Cannia, and C. C. Canavier
A Modeling Study Suggesting a Possible Pharmacological Target to Mitigate the Effects of Ethanol on Reward-Related Dopaminergic Signaling
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2703 - 2707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.