| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Neurosciences Program and Department of Electrical Engineering and 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Submitted 21 March 2006; accepted in final form 10 July 2006
Neurons in premotor and motor cortex show preparatory activity during an instructed-delay task. It has been suggested that such activity primarily reflects visuospatial aspects of the movement, such as target location or reach direction and extent. We asked whether a more dynamic feature, movement speed, is also reflected. Two monkeys were trained to reach at different speeds ("slow" or "fast," peak speed being 
50–100% higher for the latter) depending on target color. Targets were presented in seven directions and at two distances. Of 95 neurons with tuned delay-period activity, 95, 78, and 94% showed a significant influence of direction, distance, and instructed speed, respectively. Average peak modulations with respect to direction, distance and speed were 18, 10, and 11 spikes/s. Although robust, modulations of firing rate with target direction were not necessarily invariant: for 45% of neurons, the preferred direction depended significantly on target distance and/or instructed speed. We collected an additional dataset, examining in more detail the effect of target distance (5 distances from 3 to 12 cm in 2 directions). Of 41 neurons with tuned delay-period activity, 85, 83, and 98% showed a significant impact of direction, distance, and instructed speed. Statistical interactions between the effects of distance and instructed speed were common, but it was nevertheless clear that distance "tuning" was not in general a simple consequence of speed tuning. We conclude that delay-period preparatory activity robustly reflects a nonspatial aspect of the upcoming reach. However, it is unclear whether the recorded neural responses conform to any simple reference frame, intrinsic or extrinsic.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. Chestek, A. P. Batista, G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, A. Afshar, J. P. Cunningham, V. Gilja, S. I. Ryu, M. M. Churchland, and K. V. Shenoy Single-Neuron Stability during Repeated Reaching in Macaque Premotor Cortex J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10742 - 10750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Batista, G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, and K. V. Shenoy Reference Frames for Reach Planning in Macaque Dorsal Premotor Cortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 966 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Churchland and K. V. Shenoy Temporal Complexity and Heterogeneity of Single-Neuron Activity in Premotor and Motor Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4235 - 4257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Yu, C. Kemere, G. Santhanam, A. Afshar, S. I. Ryu, T. H. Meng, M. Sahani, and K. V. Shenoy Mixture of Trajectory Models for Neural Decoding of Goal-Directed Movements J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3763 - 3780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Churchland and K. V. Shenoy Delay of Movement Caused by Disruption of Cortical Preparatory Activity J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 348 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Cisek Preparing for Speed. Focus on "Preparatory Activity in Premotor and Motor Cortex Reflects the Speed of the Upcoming Reach" J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2842 - 2843. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
