JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 3398-3408, 2006. First published September 27, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00556.2006
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/3398    most recent
00556.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Wandell, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Wandell, B. A.

Assessment of Stimulus-Induced Changes in Human V1 Visual Field Maps

Junjie V. Liu1, Hiroshi Ashida2,3, Andrew T. Smith2 and Brian A. Wandell4

1Departments of Applied Physics and 4Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; 2Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, United Kingdom; and 3Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Submitted 24 May 2006; accepted in final form 8 September 2006

Visual cortex contains a set of field maps in which nearby scene points are represented in the responses of nearby neurons. We tested a recent hypothesis that the visual field map in primary visual cortex (V1) is dynamic, changing in response to stimulus motion direction. The original experimental report replicates, but further experimental and analytical investigations do not support, the interpretation of the results. The V1 map remains invariant when measured using stimuli moving in different directions. The measurements can be explained by small and systematic response amplitude differences that arise when probing with stimuli moving in different directions.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. A. Wandell, Jordan Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (E-mail: wandell{at}stanford.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. H. Arnold, A. Birt, and T. S. A. Wallis
Perceived Size and Spatial Coding
J. Neurosci., June 4, 2008; 28(23): 5954 - 5958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.