JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 3433-3447, 2006. First published August 2, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01130.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/3433    most recent
01130.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nealen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nealen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M. F.

Distributed and Selective Auditory Representation of Song Repertoires in the Avian Song System

Paul M. Nealen1 and Marc F. Schmidt1,2

1Department of Biology and 2Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 26 September 2005; accepted in final form 26 July 2006

For many songbirds, the vocal repertoire constitutes acoustically distinct songs that are flexibly used in various behavioral contexts. To investigate how these different vocalizations are represented in the song neural system, we presented multiple song stimuli while performing extracellular recording in nucleus HVC in adult male song sparrows Melospiza melodia, a species known for its complex vocal repertoire and territorial use of song. We observed robust auditory responses to natural song stimuli in both awake and anesthetized animals. Auditory responses were selective for multiple songs of the bird's own repertoire (BOR) over acoustically modified versions of these stimuli. Selectivity was evident in both awake and anesthetized HVC, in contrast to auditory selectivity in zebra finch HVC, which is apparent only under anesthesia. Presentation of multiple song stimuli at different recording locations demonstrated that stimulus acoustic features and local neuronal tuning both contribute to auditory responsiveness. HVC auditory responsiveness was broadly distributed and nontopographic. Variance in auditory responsiveness was greater among than within HVC recording locations in both anesthetized and awake birds, in contrast to the global nature of auditory representation within zebra finch HVC. To assess the spatial consistency of auditory representation within HVC, we measured the repeatability with which ensembles of BOR songs were represented across the nucleus. Auditory response ranks to different songs were more consistent across recording locations in awake than in anesthetized animals. This spatial reliability of auditory responsiveness suggests that sound stimulus acoustic features contribute relatively more to auditory responsiveness in awake than in anesthetized animals.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. M. Nealen, Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 114 Weyandt Hall, 975 Oakland Avenue, Indiana, PA 15705-1001 (E-mail: pnealen{at}iup.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.