HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Neurophysiol 97: 307-319, 2007. First published October 4, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00168.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00

This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/1/307    most recent 00168.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lehky, S. R. Articles by Sereno, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lehky, S. R. Articles by Sereno, A. B.

Comparison of Shape Encoding in Primate Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways

¹Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California; ²Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas–Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas; and ³Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Submitted 16 February 2006; accepted in final form 26 September 2006

Ventral and dorsal visual pathways perform fundamentally different functions. The former is involved in object recognition, whereas the latter carries out spatial localization of stimuli and visual guidance of motor actions. Despite the association of the dorsal pathway with spatial vision, recent studies have reported shape selectivity in the dorsal stream. We compared shape encoding in anterior inferotemporal cortex (AIT), a high-level ventral area, with that in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP), a high-level dorsal area, during a fixation task. We found shape selectivities of individual neurons to be greater in anterior inferotemporal cortex than in lateral intraparietal cortex. At the neural population level, responses to different shapes were more dissimilar in AIT than LIP. Both observations suggest a greater capacity in AIT for making finer shape distinctions. Multivariate analyses of AIT data grouped together similar shapes based on neural population responses, whereas such grouping was indistinct in LIP. Thus in a first comparison of shape response properties in late stages of the two visual pathways, we report that AIT exhibits greater capability than LIP for both object discrimination and generalization. These differences in the two visual pathways provide the first neurophysiological evidence that shape encoding in the dorsal pathway is distinct from and not a mere duplication of that formed in the ventral pathway. In addition to shape selectivity, we observed stimulus-driven cognitive effects in both areas. Stimulus repetition suppression in LIP was similar to the well-known repetition suppression in AIT and may be associated with the "inhibition of return" memory effect observed during reflexive attention.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Yokoi and H. Komatsu Relationship between Neural Responses and Visual Grouping in the Monkey Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., October 21, 2009; 29(42): 13210 - 13221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Srivastava, G. A. Orban, P. A. De Maziere, and P. Janssen A Distinct Representation of Three-Dimensional Shape in Macaque Anterior Intraparietal Area: Fast, Metric, and Coarse J. Neurosci., August 26, 2009; 29(34): 10613 - 10626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Sripati and C. R. Olson Representing the Forest before the Trees: A Global Advantage Effect in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7788 - 7796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Farivar, O. Blanke, and A. Chaudhuri Dorsal-Ventral Integration in the Recognition of Motion-Defined Unfamiliar Faces J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5336 - 5342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Rajimehr, J. C. Young, and R. B. H. Tootell An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps PNAS, February 10, 2009; 106(6): 1995 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ogawa and H. Komatsu Condition-Dependent and Condition-Independent Target Selection in the Macaque Posterior Parietal Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 721 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Peng, M. E. Sereno, A. K. Silva, S. R. Lehky, and A. B. Sereno Shape Selectivity in Primate Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 796 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Janssen, S. Srivastava, S. Ombelet, and G. A. Orban Coding of Shape and Position in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6679 - 6690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kiani, H. Esteky, K. Mirpour, and K. Tanaka Object Category Structure in Response Patterns of Neuronal Population in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4296 - 4309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]