JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 348-359, 2007. First published September 27, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00808.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/1/348    most recent
00808.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.

Delay of Movement Caused by Disruption of Cortical Preparatory Activity

Mark M. Churchland and Krishna V. Shenoy

Neurosciences Program and Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Submitted 3 August 2006; accepted in final form 16 September 2006

We tested the hypothesis that delay-period activity in premotor cortex is essential to movement preparation. During a delayed-reach task, we used subthreshold intracortical microstimulation to disrupt putative "preparatory" activity. Microstimulation led to a highly specific increase in reach reaction time. Effects were largest when activity was disrupted around the time of the go cue. Earlier disruptions, which presumably allowed movement preparation time to recover, had only a weak impact. Furthermore, saccadic reaction time showed little or no increase. Finally, microstimulation of nearby primary motor cortex, even when slightly suprathreshold, had little effect on reach reaction time. These findings provide the first evidence, of a causal and temporally specific nature, that activity in premotor cortex is fundamental to movement preparation. Furthermore, although reaction times were increased, the movements themselves were essentially unperturbed. This supports the suggestion that movement preparation is an active and actively monitored process and that movement can be delayed until inaccuracies are repaired. These results are readily interpreted in the context of the recently developed optimal-subspace hypothesis.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. V. Shenoy, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Neurosciences Program, 330 Serra Mall, CISX 319, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305-4075 (E-mail: shenoy{at}stanford.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. J. Tehovnik and W. M. Slocum
What Delay Fields Tell Us About Striate Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 559 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. P. Batista, G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, and K. V. Shenoy
Reference Frames for Reach Planning in Macaque Dorsal Premotor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 966 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Basso and P. Liu
Context-Dependent Effects of Substantia Nigra Stimulation on Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4129 - 4142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.