HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/2/1030    most recent 00794.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Povysheva, N. V. Articles by Krimer, L. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Povysheva, N. V. Articles by Krimer, L. S.

Electrophysiological Differences Between Neurogliaform Cells From Monkey and Rat Prefrontal Cortex

¹Departments of Psychiatry and²Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Submitted 1 August 2006; accepted in final form 14 November 2006

Current dogma holds that a canonical cortical circuit is formed by cellular elements that are basically identical across species. However, detailed and direct comparisons between species of specific elements of this circuit are limited in number. In this study, we compared the morphological and physiological properties of neurogliaform (NGF) inhibitory neurons in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of macaque monkeys and rats. In both species, NGF cells were readily identified based on their distinctive morphological features. Indeed, monkey NGF cells had only a few morphological features that differed from rat, including a larger soma, a greater number of dendrites, and a more compact axonal field. In contrast, whole cell recordings of the responses to injected current steps revealed important differences between monkey and rat NGF cells. Monkey NGF cells consistently generated a short-latency first spike riding on an initial depolarizing hump, whereas in rat NGF cells, the first spike appeared after a substantial delay riding on a depolarizing ramp not seen in monkey NGF cells. Thus although rat NGF cells are traditionally classified as late-spiking cells, monkey NGF cells did not meet this physiological criterion. In addition, NGF cells in monkey appeared to be more excitable than those in rat because they displayed a higher input resistance, a lower spike threshold, and a higher firing frequency. Finally, NGF cells in monkey showed a more prominent spike-frequency adaptation as compared with rat. Our findings indicate that the canonical cortical circuit differs in at least some aspects of its constituent elements across species.