JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 1298-1310, 2007. First published November 15, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00167.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1298    most recent
00167.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehky, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lehky, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, K.

Enhancement of Object Representations in Primate Perirhinal Cortex During a Visual Working-Memory Task

Sidney R. Lehky1 and Keiji Tanaka1,2

1Cognitive Brain Mapping Laboratory, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama; and 2Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan

Submitted 16 February 2006; accepted in final form 6 November 2006

We compared single-cell activities in perirhinal cortex (PRh) as well as adjacent visual cortex (area TE) across two tasks. One task required the monkey to identify any stimulus repetition within a sequence of object stimuli. In the other task, the same stimuli were presented, but the monkey didn’t have to remember them. PRh responses during the object-memory task were elevated relative to those during the second task. In TE, on the other hand, there were no significant task-related differences in responses. We did not observe task-related differences related to repetition effects in either brain area. The onset of the enhanced signal in PRh during the object-memory task occurred with a latency of 80 ms after the onset of the stimulus response, suggesting that it was the result of top-down feedback.


Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. R. Lehky, Computational Neuroscience Lab, The Salk Institute, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037 (E-mail: sidney{at}salk.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.