JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 1445-1456, 2007. First published August 16, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01338.2005
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1445    most recent
01338.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruksenas, O.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruksenas, O.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.

Dynamics of Spatial Resolution of Single Units in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cat During Brief Visual Stimulation

O. Ruksenas, A. Bulatov and P. Heggelund

Department of Physiology, University of Oslo, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Oslo, Norway

Submitted 20 December 2005; accepted in final form 7 August 2006

Sharpness of vision depends on the resolution of details conveyed by individual neurons in the visual pathway. In the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), the neurons have receptive fields with center-surround organization, and spatial resolution may be measured as the inverse of center size. We studied dynamics of receptive field center size of single LGN neurons during the response to briefly (400–500 ms) presented static light or dark spots. Center size was estimated from a series of spatial summation curves made for successive 5-ms intervals during the stimulation period. The center was wide at the start of the response, but shrank rapidly over 50–100 ms after stimulus onset, whereupon it widened slightly. Thereby, the spatial resolution changed from coarse-to-fine with average peak resolution occurring ~70 ms after stimulus onset. The changes in spatial resolution did not follow changes of firing rate; peak firing appeared earlier than the maximal spatial resolution. We suggest that the response initially conveys a strong but spatially coarse message that might have a detection and tune-in function, followed by transient transmission of spatially precise information about the stimulus. Experiments with spots presented inside the maximum but outside the minimum center width suggested a dynamic reduction in number of responding neurons during the stimulation; from many responding neurons initially when the field centers are large to fewer responding neurons as the centers shrink. Thereby, there is a change from coarse-to-fine also in the recruitment of responding neurons during brief static stimulation.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Heggelund, Univ. of Oslo, Inst. of Basic Medical Sciences, Dept. of Physiology, PO Box 1103 Blindern, N-0717 Oslo, Norway (E-mail: paul.heggelund{at}medisin.uio.no)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.