JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 1527-1545, 2007. First published November 29, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01160.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/1527    most recent
01160.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suminski, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Scheidt, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suminski, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Scheidt, R. A.

Neural and Electromyographic Correlates of Wrist Posture Control

Aaron J. Suminski1, Stephen M. Rao2, Kristine M. Mosier3 and Robert A. Scheidt1,4

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University; and 2Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; 3Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 4Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 31 October 2006; accepted in final form 26 November 2006

In identical experiments in and out of a MR scanner, we recorded functional magnetic resonance imaging and electromyographic correlates of wrist stabilization against constant and time-varying mechanical perturbations. Positioning errors were greatest while stabilizing random torques. Wrist muscle activity lagged changes in joint angular velocity at latencies suggesting trans-cortical reflex action. Drift in stabilized hand positions gave rise to frequent, accurately directed, corrective movements, suggesting that the brain maintains separate representations of desired wrist angle for feedback control of posture and the generation of discrete corrections. Two patterns of neural activity were evident in the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) time series obtained during stabilization. A cerebello-thalamo-cortical network showed significant activity whenever position errors were present. Here, changes in activation correlated with moment-by-moment changes in position errors (not force), implicating this network in the feedback control of hand position. A second network, showing elevated activity during stabilization whether errors were present or not, included prefrontal cortex, rostral dorsal premotor and supplementary motor area cortices, and inferior aspects of parietal cortex. BOLD activation in some of these regions correlated with positioning errors integrated over a longer time-frame consistent with optimization of feedback performance via adjustment of the behavioral goal (feedback setpoint) and the planning and execution of internally generated motor actions. The finding that nonoverlapping networks demonstrate differential sensitivity to kinematic performance errors over different time scales supports the hypothesis that in stabilizing the hand, the brain recruits distinct neural systems for feedback control of limb position and for evaluation/adjustment of controller parameters in response to persistent errors.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. A. Scheidt, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Olin Engineering Center, 303, P.O. Box 1881, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881 (E-mail: scheidt{at}ieee.org)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott
Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. M. Stoeckmann, K. J. Sullivan, and R. A. Scheidt
Elastic, Viscous, and Mass Load Effects on Poststroke Muscle Recruitment and Co-contraction During Reaching: A Pilot Study
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2009; 89(7): 665 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez
Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.