HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/4/3057    most recent 00897.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cheng, S. Articles by Sabes, P. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cheng, S. Articles by Sabes, P. N.

Calibration of Visually Guided Reaching Is Driven by Error-Corrective Learning and Internal Dynamics

Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California

Submitted 22 August 2006; accepted in final form 16 December 2006

The sensorimotor calibration of visually guided reaching changes on a trial-to-trial basis in response to random shifts in the visual feedback of the hand. We show that a simple linear dynamical system is sufficient to model the dynamics of this adaptive process. In this model, an internal variable represents the current state of sensorimotor calibration. Changes in this state are driven by error feedback signals, which consist of the visually perceived reach error, the artificial shift in visual feedback, or both. Subjects correct for 20% of the error observed on each movement, despite being unaware of the visual shift. The state of adaptation is also driven by internal dynamics, consisting of a decay back to a baseline state and a "state noise" process. State noise includes any source of variability that directly affects the state of adaptation, such as variability in sensory feedback processing, the computations that drive learning, or the maintenance of the state. This noise is accumulated in the state across trials, creating temporal correlations in the sequence of reach errors. These correlations allow us to distinguish state noise from sensorimotor performance noise, which arises independently on each trial from random fluctuations in the sensorimotor pathway. We show that these two noise sources contribute comparably to the overall magnitude of movement variability. Finally, the dynamics of adaptation measured with random feedback shifts generalizes to the case of constant feedback shifts, allowing for a direct comparison of our results with more traditional blocked-exposure experiments.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. S. Huang and R. Shadmehr Persistence of Motor Memories Reflects Statistics of the Learning Event J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 931 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wei and K. Kording Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation? J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 655 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Simani, L. M. M. McGuire, and P. N. Sabes Visual-Shift Adaptation Is Composed of Separable Sensory and Task-Dependent Effects J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2827 - 2841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]