JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 3219-3228, 2007. First published March 7, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00477.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3219    most recent
00477.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raethjen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Deuschl, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raethjen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Deuschl, G.

Cortical Involvement in the Generation of Essential Tremor

Jan Raethjen1, R. B. Govindan1, Florian Kopper1, M. Muthuraman2 and Günther Deuschl1

1Department of Neurology and 2Institute for Circuit and System Theory, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Submitted 4 May 2006; accepted in final form 3 March 2007

Conflicting results on the existence of tremor-related cortical activity in essential tremor (ET) have raised questions on the role of the cortex in tremor generation. Here we attempt to address these issues. We recorded 64 channel surface EEGs and EMGs from forearm muscles in 15 patients with definite ET. EEG and EMG power spectra, relative power of the rhythmic EMG activity, relative EEG power at the tremor frequency, and EEG–EMG and EEG–EEG coherence were calculated and their dynamics over time explored. Corticomuscular delay was studied using a new method for narrow-band coherent signals. Corticomuscular coherence in the contralateral central region at the tremor frequency was present in all patients in recordings with a relative tremor EMG power exceeding a certain level. However, the coherence was lost intermittently even with tremors far above this level. Physiological 15- to 30-Hz coherence was found consistently in 11 patients with significantly weaker EMG activity in this frequency range. A more frontal (mesial) hot spot was also intermittently coupled with the tremor and the central hot spot in five patients. Corticomuscular delays were compatible with transmission in fast corticospinal pathways and feedback of the tremor signal. Thus the tremor rhythm is intermittently relayed only in different cortical motor areas. We hypothesize that tremor oscillations build up in different subcortical and subcortico-cortical circuits only temporarily entraining each other.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Deuschl, Dept. of Neurology, University of Kiel, Schittenhelmstraße 10, 24105 Kiel, Germany (E-mail: g.deuschl{at}neurologie.uni-kiel.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.