JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 3351-3364, 2007. First published March 14, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.01328.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3351    most recent
01328.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stark, E.
Right arrow Articles by Abeles, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stark, E.
Right arrow Articles by Abeles, M.

Encoding of Reach and Grasp by Single Neurons in Premotor Cortex Is Independent of Recording Site

Eran Stark1, Itay Asher1,2 and Moshe Abeles1,2,3

1Department of Physiology, Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; 2The Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; and 3Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Submitted 18 December 2006; accepted in final form 5 March 2007

Neural activity has been studied during reaching and grasping separately, yet little is known about their combined representation. To study the functional organization of reaching and grasping in the premotor cortex (PM), we trained two monkeys to reach in one of six directions and grasp one of three objects. During prehensile movements, activity of proximal (shoulder and elbow) muscles was mainly modulated by reach direction, whereas distal (finger) muscles were also modulated by grasp type. Using intracortical microstimulation, we identified spatially distinct PM sites from which movements of proximal or distal joints were evoked. In contrast to muscles, modulation of neural activity by reach direction was similar for single units recorded in proximal and distal sites. Similarly, grasp type encoding was the same for units recorded in the different sites. This pattern of encoding reach and grasp irrespective of recoding site was observed throughout the task: before, during, and after prehension movements. Despite the similarities between single units within different sites, we found differences between pairs of units. Pairs of directionally selective units recorded by the same electrode in the same proximal site preferred similar reach directions but not grasp types, whereas pairs of object-selective units recorded in the same distal site tended to prefer the same grasp type but not reach direction. We suggest that the unexpected "mixing neurons" encoding reach and grasp within distal and proximal sites, respectively, provide a neural substrate for coordination between reach and grasp during prehension.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: E. Stark, Dept. of Physiology, Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel (E-mail: eran.stark{at}ekmd.huji.ac.il)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Stark and M. Abeles
Predicting Movement from Multiunit Activity
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8387 - 8394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.