HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/5/3439    most recent 00881.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tang, Y. Articles by Snodderly, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tang, Y. Articles by Snodderly, D. M.

Eye Position Compensation Improves Estimates of Response Magnitude and Receptive Field Geometry in Alert Monkeys

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia; ²Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; ³Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel; ⁴Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and ⁵Department of Human Ecology and Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, Texas

Submitted 18 August 2006; accepted in final form 24 February 2007

Studies of visual function in behaving subjects require that stimuli be positioned reliably on the retina in the presence of eye movements. Fixational eye movements scatter stimuli about the retina, inflating estimates of receptive field dimensions, reducing estimates of peak responses, and blurring maps of receptive field subregions. Scleral search coils are frequently used to measure eye position, but their utility for correcting the effects of fixational eye movements on receptive field maps has been questioned. Using eye coils sutured to the sclera and preamplifiers configured to minimize cable artifacts, we reexamined this issue in two rhesus monkeys. During repeated fixation trials, the eye position signal was used to adjust the stimulus position, compensating for eye movements and correcting the stimulus position to place it at the desired location on the retina. Estimates of response magnitudes and receptive field characteristics in V1 and in LGN were obtained in both compensated and uncompensated conditions. Receptive fields were narrower, with steeper borders, and response amplitudes were higher when eye movement compensation was used. In sum, compensating for eye movements facilitated more precise definition of the receptive field. We also monitored horizontal vergence over long sequences of fixation trials and found the variability to be low, as expected for this precise behavior. Our results imply that eye coil signals can be highly accurate and useful for optimizing visual physiology when rigorous precautions are observed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Physiological differences between neurons in layer 2 and layer 3 of primary visual cortex (V1) of alert macaque monkeys J. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 586(9): 2293 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 383 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]