JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 3532-3543, 2007. First published March 7, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.01042.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3532    most recent
01042.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R.

Repetition Suppression in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex: Relation to Behavioral Priming

David B. T. McMahon1,2 and Carl R. Olson1,2

1Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Mellon Institute, and 2Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Submitted 29 September 2006; accepted in final form 21 February 2007

In tasks requiring judgments about visual stimuli, humans exhibit repetition priming, responding with increased speed when a stimulus is repeated. Repetition priming might depend on repetition suppression, a phenomenon first observed in monkey inferotemporal cortex (IT) whereby, when a stimulus is repeated, the strength of the neuronal visual response is reduced. If the reduction resulted in sharpening of the cortical representation of the stimulus, and did not just scale it down, then speeded processing might result. To explore the relation between repetition priming and repetition suppression, we monitored neuronal activity in IT while monkeys performed a symmetry decision task. We found 1) that monkeys exhibit repetition priming, 2) that IT neurons simultaneously exhibit repetition suppression, 3) that repetition priming and repetition suppression do not vary in a significantly correlated fashion across trials, and 4) that repetition suppression scales down the representation of the stimulus without sharpening it. We conclude that repetition suppression accompanies repetition priming but is unlikely to be its cause.


Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. McMahon, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (E-mail: dbtm{at}mit.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. P. Sripati and C. R. Olson
Representing the Forest before the Trees: A Global Advantage Effect in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7788 - 7796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Woloszyn and D. L. Sheinberg
Neural Dynamics in Inferior Temporal Cortex during a Visual Working Memory Task
J. Neurosci., April 29, 2009; 29(17): 5494 - 5507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. T. McMahon and C. R. Olson
Linearly Additive Shape and Color Signals in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1867 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Liu, S. O. Murray, and B. Jagadeesh
Time Course and Stimulus Dependence of Repetition-Induced Response Suppression in Inferotemporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 418 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Liu and B. Jagadeesh
Neural Selectivity in Anterior Inferotemporal Cortex for Morphed Photographic Images During Behavioral Classification or Fixation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 966 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Epstein, W. E. Parker, and A. M. Feiler
Two Kinds of fMRI Repetition Suppression? Evidence for Dissociable Neural Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2877 - 2886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Z. Lin
fMRI Adaptation: Stimulus Specific or Processing Load Specific?
J. Neurosci., October 24, 2007; 27(43): 11453 - 11454.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.