|
|
||||||||
1Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Human Development and the Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; 2Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 3 Department of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Submitted 12 December 2006; accepted in final form 11 March 2007
The auditory cortex of the rat is becoming an increasingly popular model system for studies of experience-dependent receptive field plasticity. However, the relative position of various fields within the auditory core and the receptive field organization within each field have yet to be fully described in the normative case. In this study, the macro- and micro-organizational features of the auditory cortex were studied in pentobarbital-anesthetized adult rats with a combination of physiological and anatomical methods. Dense microelectrode mapping procedures were used to identify the relative position of five tonotopically organized fields within the auditory core: primary auditory cortex (AI), the posterior auditory field (PAF), the anterior auditory field (AAF), the ventral auditory field (VAF), and the suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF). AI and AAF both featured short-latency, sharply tuned responses with predominantly monotonic intensity-response functions. SRAF and PAF were both characterized by longer-latency, broadly tuned responses. VAF directly abutted the ventral boundary of AI but was almost exclusively composed of low-threshold nonmonotonic intensity-tuned responses. Dual injection of retrograde tracers into AI and VAF was used to demonstrate that the sources of thalamic input from the medial geniculate body to each area were essentially nonoverlapping. An analysis of receptive field parameters beyond characteristic frequency revealed independent spatially ordered representations for features related to spectral tuning, intensity tuning, and onset response properties in AI, AAF, VAF, and SRAF. These data demonstrate that despite its greatly reduced physical scale, the rat auditory cortex features a surprising degree of organizational complexity and detail.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. D. Szymanski, J. A. Garcia-Lazaro, and J. W. H. Schnupp Current Source Density Profiles of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in Rat Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1483 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Campi, K. L. Bales, R. Grunewald, and L. Krubitzer Connections of Auditory and Visual Cortex in the Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster): Evidence for Multisensory Processing in Primary Sensory Areas Cereb Cortex, April 24, 2009; (2009) bhp082v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Rodgers, A. M. Benison, A. Klein, and D. S. Barth Auditory, Somatosensory, and Multisensory Insular Cortex in the Rat Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 2941 - 2951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |