HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/5/3670    most recent 00003.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Epstein, R. A. Articles by Feiler, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Epstein, R. A. Articles by Feiler, A. M.

Visual Scene Processing in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments

Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 2 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 March 2007

Humans and animals use information obtained from the local visual scene to orient themselves in the wider world. Although neural systems involved in scene perception have been identified, the extent to which processing in these systems is affected by previous experience is unclear. We addressed this issue by scanning subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they viewed photographs of familiar and unfamiliar locations. Scene-selective regions in parahippocampal cortex (the parahippocampal place area, or PPA), retrosplenial cortex (RSC), and the transverse occipital sulcus (TOS) responded more strongly to images of familiar locations than to images of unfamiliar locations with the strongest effects (>50% increase) in RSC. Examination of fMRI repetition suppression (RS) effects indicated that images of familiar and unfamiliar locations were processed with the same degree of viewpoint specificity; however, increased viewpoint invariance was observed as individual scenes became more familiar over the course of a scan session. Surprisingly, these within-scan-session viewpoint-invariant RS effects were only observed when scenes were repeated across different trials but not when scenes were repeated within a trial, suggesting that within- and between-trial RS effects may index different aspects of visual scene processing. The sensitivity to environmental familiarity observed in the PPA, RSC, and TOS supports earlier claims that these regions mediate the extraction of navigationally relevant spatial information from visual scenes. As locations become familiar, the neural representations of these locations become enriched, but the viewpoint invariance of these representations does not change.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Schon, Y. T. Quiroz, M. E. Hasselmo, and C. E. Stern Greater Working Memory Load Results in Greater Medial Temporal Activity at Retrieval Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 2561 - 2571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Simmons, M. Reddish, P. S. F. Bellgowan, and A. Martin The Selectivity and Functional Connectivity of the Anterior Temporal Lobes Cereb Cortex, July 20, 2009; (2009) bhp149v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Schendan and C. E. Stern Where Vision Meets Memory: Prefrontal-Posterior Networks for Visual Object Constancy during Categorization and Recognition Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1695 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Epstein, W. E. Parker, and A. M. Feiler Two Kinds of fMRI Repetition Suppression? Evidence for Dissociable Neural Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2877 - 2886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. MacEvoy and R. A. Epstein Position Selectivity in Scene- and Object-Responsive Occipitotemporal Regions J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2089 - 2098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Epstein, W. E. Parker, and A. M. Feiler Where Am I Now? Distinct Roles for Parahippocampal and Retrosplenial Cortices in Place Recognition J. Neurosci., June 6, 2007; 27(23): 6141 - 6149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]