JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 3736-3750, 2007. First published March 14, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.01064.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3736    most recent
01064.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trainin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Karniel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trainin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Karniel, A.

Explaining Patterns of Neural Activity in the Primary Motor Cortex Using Spinal Cord and Limb Biomechanics Models

Ehud Trainin1, Ron Meir1 and Amir Karniel2

1Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa; and 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

Submitted 5 October 2006; accepted in final form 4 March 2007

What determines the specific pattern of activation of primary motor cortex (M1) neurons in the context of a given motor task? We present a systems level physiological model describing the transformation from the neural activity in M1, through the muscle control signal, into joint torques and down to endpoint forces and movements. The redundancy of the system is resolved by biologically plausible optimization criteria. The model explains neural activity at both the population, and single neuron, levels. Due to the model's relative simplicity and analytic tractability, it provides intuition as to the most salient features of the system as well as a possible causal explanation of how these determine the overall behavior. Moreover, it explains a large number of recent observations, including the temporal patterns of single-neuron and population firing rates during isometric and movement tasks, narrow tuning curves, non cosine tuning curves, changes of preferred directions during a task, and changes of preferred directions due to different experimental conditions.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Meir, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel (E-mail: rmeir{at}ee.technion.ac.il)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. W. Franklin, E. Burdet, K. Peng Tee, R. Osu, C.-M. Chew, T. E. Milner, and M. Kawato
CNS Learns Stable, Accurate, and Efficient Movements Using a Simple Algorithm
J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11165 - 11173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.