HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 97/6/3976    most recent 01281.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, V. S. Articles by Shadmehr, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, V. S. Articles by Shadmehr, R.

Evolution of Motor Memory During the Seconds After Observation of Motor Error

Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 6 December 2006; accepted in final form 4 April 2007

When a movement results in error, the nervous system amends the motor commands that generate the subsequent movement. Here we show that this adaptation depends not just on error, but also on passage of time between the two movements. We observed that subjects learned a reaching task faster, i.e., with fewer trials, when the intertrial time intervals (ITIs) were lengthened. We hypothesized two computational mechanisms that could have accounted for this. First, learning could have been driven by a Bayesian process where the learner assumed that errors are the result of perturbations that have multiple timescales. In theory, longer ITIs can produce faster learning because passage of time might increase uncertainty, which in turn increases sensitivity to error. Second, error in a trial may result in a trace that decays with time. If the learner continued to sample from the trace during the ITI, then adaptation would increase with increased ITIs. The two models made separate predictions: The Bayesian model predicted that when movements are separated by random ITIs, the learner would learn most from a trial that followed a long time interval. In contrast, the trace model predicted that the learner would learn most from a trial that preceded a long time interval. We performed two experiments to test for these predictions and in both experiments found evidence for the trace model. We suggest that motor error produces an error memory trace that decays with a time constant of about 4 s, continuously promoting adaptation until the next movement.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Hadipour-Niktarash, C. K. Lee, J. E. Desmond, and R. Shadmehr Impairment of Retention But Not Acquisition of a Visuomotor Skill Through Time-Dependent Disruption of Primary Motor Cortex J. Neurosci., December 5, 2007; 27(49): 13413 - 13419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3321 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]