HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/1/253    most recent 01309.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Puckett, A. C. Articles by Kilgard, M. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Puckett, A. C. Articles by Kilgard, M. P.

Plasticity in the Rat Posterior Auditory Field Following Nucleus Basalis Stimulation

Neuroscience Program, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas

Submitted 14 December 2007; accepted in final form 21 April 2007

Classical conditioning paradigms have been shown to cause frequency-specific plasticity in both primary and secondary cortical areas. Previous research demonstrated that repeated pairing of nucleus basalis (NB) stimulation with a tone results in plasticity in primary auditory cortex (A1), mimicking the changes observed after classical conditioning. However, few studies have documented the effects of similar paradigms in secondary cortical areas. The purpose of this study was to quantify plasticity in the posterior auditory field (PAF) of the rat after NB stimulation paired with a high-frequency tone. NB–tone pairing increased the frequency selectivity of PAF sites activated by the paired tone. This frequency-specific receptive field size narrowing led to a reorganization of PAF such that responses to low- and mid-frequency tones were reduced by 40%. Plasticity in A1 was consistent with previous studies—pairing a high-frequency tone with NB stimulation expanded the high-frequency region of the frequency map. Receptive field sizes did not change, but characteristic frequencies in A1 were shifted after NB–tone pairing. These results demonstrate that experience-dependent plasticity can take different forms in both A1 and secondary auditory cortex.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Ma and N. Suga Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Primary Auditory Cortex Elicited by Thalamic Auditory Neurons J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4888 - 4896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Ji and N. Suga Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Pseudoconditioning: Role of Acetylcholine Receptors and the Somatosensory Cortex J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1384 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]