HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/2/920    most recent 00183.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blouin, J.-S. Articles by Inglis, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blouin, J.-S. Articles by Inglis, J. T.

Neural Control of Superficial and Deep Neck Muscles in Humans

¹School of Human Kinetics and ²Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; ³MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, Richmond; and ⁴International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Submitted 17 February 2007; accepted in final form 26 May 2007

Human neck muscles have a complex multi-layered architecture. The role and neural control of these neck muscles were examined in nine seated subjects performing three series of isometric neck muscle contractions: 50-N contractions in eight fixed horizontal directions, 25-N contractions, and 50-N contractions, both with a continuously changing horizontal force direction. Activity in the left sternocleidomastoid, trapezius, levator scapulae, splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis, semispinalis cervicis, and multifidus muscles was measured with wire electrodes inserted at the C₄/C₅ level under ultrasound guidance. We hypothesized that deep and superficial neck muscles would function as postural and focal muscles, respectively, and would thus be controlled by different neural signals. To test these hypotheses, electromyographic (EMG) tuning curves and correlations in the temporal and frequency domains were computed. Three main results emerged from these analyses: EMG tuning curves from all muscles exhibited well-defined preferred directions of activation for the 50-N isometric forces, larger contractions (25 vs. 50 N) yielded more focused EMG tuning curves, and agonist neck muscles from all layers received a common neural drive in the range of 10–15 Hz. The current results demonstrate that all neck muscles can exhibit phasic activity during isometric neck muscle contractions. Similar oscillations in the EMG of neck muscles from different layers further suggest that neck motoneurons were activated by common neurons. The reticular formation appears a likely generator of the common drive to the neck motoneurons due to its widespread projections to different groups of neck motoneurons.