JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 1115-1124, 2007. First published July 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00083.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1115    most recent
00083.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heuer, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Britten, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heuer, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Britten, K. H.

Linear Responses to Stochastic Motion Signals in Area MST

Hilary W. Heuer1 and Kenneth H. Britten2,3

1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology and W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience University of California, San Francisco; 2Center for Neuroscience and 3Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California

Submitted 24 January 2007; accepted in final form 27 June 2007

The medial superior temporal (MST) area contains neurons with tuning for complex motion patterns, but very little is known about the generation of such responses. To explore how neuronal responses varied across complex motion pattern coherence, we recorded from single units while varying the strength of the global motion pattern in random dot stimuli. Stimuli were a family of optic flow patterns, consisting of radial motion, rotary motion, or combinations thereof ("spiral space"). We controlled the strength of the motion in the stimuli by varying the coherence—the proportion of dots carrying the signal. This allows motion strength to be varied independently of stimulus size, speed, or contrast. Most neurons’ responses were well described as a linear function of stimulus coherence. Although more than half the cells possessed significant nonlinearities, these typically accounted for little additional variance. Nonlinear coherence response functions could either be compressive (e.g., saturating) or expansive and occurred in both the preferred and null direction responses. The presence of nonlinearities was not related to neuronal response properties such as preferred spiral-space direction or tuning bandwidth; however, cells with compressive nonlinearities in both the preferred and null directions tended to have higher response amplitudes and were more sensitive to weak motion signals. These cells did not appear to form a distinct subpopulation within MST. Our results suggest that MST neurons predominantly linearly encode increasing pattern motion energy within their RFs.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. H. Britten, Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Ct., Davis, CA 95616 (E-mail: khbritten{at}ucdavis.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.