JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 1355-1363, 2007. First published July 18, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00476.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1355    most recent
00476.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spering, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gegenfurtner, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spering, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gegenfurtner, K. R.

Contrast and Assimilation in Motion Perception and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements

Miriam Spering and Karl R. Gegenfurtner

Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Submitted 26 April 2007; accepted in final form 13 July 2007

The analysis of visual motion serves many different functions ranging from object motion perception to the control of self-motion. The perception of visual motion and the oculomotor tracking of a moving object are known to be closely related and are assumed to be controlled by shared brain areas. We compared perceived velocity and the velocity of smooth pursuit eye movements in human observers in a paradigm that required the segmentation of target object motion from context motion. In each trial, a pursuit target and a visual context were independently perturbed simultaneously to briefly increase or decrease in speed. Observers had to accurately track the target and estimate target speed during the perturbation interval. Here we show that the same motion signals are processed in fundamentally different ways for perception and steady-state smooth pursuit eye movements. For the computation of perceived velocity, motion of the context was subtracted from target motion (motion contrast), whereas pursuit velocity was determined by the motion average (motion assimilation). We conclude that the human motion system uses these computations to optimally accomplish different functions: image segmentation for object motion perception and velocity estimation for the control of smooth pursuit eye movements.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Spering, Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, D-35394 Giessen, Germany (E-mail: miriam.spering{at}psychol.uni-giessen.de)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Tavassoli and D. L. Ringach
Dynamics of Smooth Pursuit Maintenance
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 110 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.