HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/3/1428    most recent 01140.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bayer, H. M. Articles by Glimcher, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bayer, H. M. Articles by Glimcher, P. W.

Statistics of Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Spike Trains in the Awake Primate

¹Center for Neural Science, New York University; and ²Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York

Submitted 26 October 2006; accepted in final form 2 July 2007

Work in behaving primates indicates that midbrain dopamine neurons encode a prediction error, the difference between an obtained reward and the reward expected. Studies of dopamine action potential timing in the alert and anesthetized rat indicate that dopamine neurons respond in tonic and phasic modes, a distinction that has been less well characterized in the primates. We used spike train models to examine the relationship between the tonic and burst modes of activity in dopamine neurons while monkeys were performing a reinforced visuo-saccadic movement task. We studied spiking activity during four task-related intervals; two of these were intervals during which no task-related events occurred, whereas two were periods marked by task-related phasic activity. We found that dopamine neuron spike trains during the intervals when no events occurred were well described as tonic. Action potentials appeared to be independent, to occur at low frequency, and to be almost equally well described by Gaussian and Poisson-like (gamma) processes. Unlike in the rat, interspike intervals as low as 20 ms were often observed during these presumptively tonic epochs. Having identified these periods of presumptively tonic activity, we were able to quantitatively define phasic modulations (both increases and decreases in activity) during the intervals in which task-related events occurred. This analysis revealed that the phasic modulations of these neurons include both bursting, as has been described previously, and pausing. Together bursts and pauses seemed to provide a continuous, although nonlinear, representation of the theoretically defined reward prediction error of reinforcement learning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. A. Hare, J. O'Doherty, C. F. Camerer, W. Schultz, and A. Rangel Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5623 - 5630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D'Ardenne, S. M. McClure, L. E. Nystrom, and J. D. Cohen BOLD Responses Reflecting Dopaminergic Signals in the Human Ventral Tegmental Area Science, February 29, 2008; 319(5867): 1264 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]