JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 1451-1474, 2007. First published July 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.01203.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1451    most recent
01203.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.

Dynamic Amplitude Coding in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rhesus Macaques

Brian J. Malone, Brian H. Scott and Malcolm N. Semple

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York

Submitted 14 November 2006; accepted in final form 3 July 2007

In many animals, the information most important for processing communication sounds, including speech, consists of temporal envelope cues below ~20 Hz. Physiological studies, however, have typically emphasized the upper limits of modulation encoding. Responses to sinusoidal AM (SAM) are generally summarized by modulation transfer functions (MTFs), which emphasize tuning to modulation frequency rather than the representation of the instantaneous stimulus amplitude. Unfortunately, MTFs fail to capture important but nonlinear aspects of amplitude coding in the central auditory system. We focus on an alternative data representation, the modulation period histogram (MPH), which depicts the spike train folded on the modulation period of the SAM stimulus. At low modulation frequencies, the fluctuations of stimulus amplitude in decibels are robustly encoded by the cycle-by-cycle response dynamics evident in the MPH. We show that all of the parameters that define a SAM stimulus—carrier frequency, carrier level, modulation frequency, and modulation depth—are reflected in the shape of cortical MPHs. In many neurons that are nonmonotonically tuned for sound amplitude, the representation of modulation frequency is typically sacrificed to preserve the mapping between the instantaneous discharge rate and the instantaneous stimulus amplitude, resulting in two response modes per modulation cycle. This behavior, as well as the relatively poor tuning of cortical MTFs, suggests that auditory cortical neurons are not well suited for operating as a "modulation filterbank." Instead, our results suggest that <20 Hz, the processing of modulated signals is better described as envelope shape discrimination rather than modulation frequency extraction.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Semple, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003 (E-mail: mal.semple{at}nyu.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Qin, J. Y. Wang, and Y. Sato
Representations of Cat Meows and Human Vowels in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Cats
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2305 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.