JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 2566-2579, 2007. First published September 19, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00595.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/2566    most recent
00595.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mc Laughlin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mc Laughlin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.

Comparison of Bandwidths in the Inferior Colliculus and the Auditory Nerve. I. Measurement Using a Spectrally Manipulated Stimulus

Myles Mc Laughlin, Bram Van de Sande, Marcel van der Heijden and Philip X. Joris

Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Medical School, Campus Gasthuisberg, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Submitted 25 May 2007; accepted in final form 18 September 2007

A defining feature of auditory systems across animal divisions is the ability to sort different frequency components of a sound into separate neural frequency channels. Narrowband filtering in the auditory periphery is of obvious advantage for the representation of sound spectrum and manifests itself pervasively in human psychophysical studies as the critical band. Peripheral filtering also alters coding of the temporal waveform, so that temporal responses in the auditory periphery reflect both the stimulus waveform and peripheral filtering. Temporal coding is essential for the measurement of the time delay between waveforms at the two ears—a critical component of sound localization. A number of human psychophysical studies have shown a wider effective critical bandwidth with binaural stimuli than with monaural stimuli, although other studies found no difference. Here we directly compare binaural and monaural bandwidths (BWs) in the anesthetized cat. We measure monaural BW in the auditory nerve (AN) and binaural BW in the inferior colliculus (IC) using spectrally manipulated broadband noise and response metrics that reflect spike timing. The stimulus was a pair of noise tokens that were interaurally in phase for all frequencies below a certain flip frequency (fflip) and that had an interaural phase difference of {pi} above fflip. The response was measured as a function of fflip and, using a separate stimulus protocol, as a function of interaural correlation. We find that both AN and IC filter BW depend on characteristic frequency, but that there is no difference in mean BW between the AN and IC.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Mc Laughlin, Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N 2, Herestraat 49 bus 1021, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium (E-mail: myles.mclaughlin{at}med.kuleuven.be)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Mc Laughlin, J. N. Chabwine, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris
Comparison of Bandwidths in the Inferior Colliculus and the Auditory Nerve. II: Measurement Using a Temporally Manipulated Stimulus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2312 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.