HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/6/3321    most recent 00576.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mattar, A. A. G. Articles by Ostry, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mattar, A. A. G. Articles by Ostry, D. J.

Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning

¹Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and ²Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut

Submitted 22 May 2007; accepted in final form 9 October 2007

Studies on plasticity in motor function have shown that motor learning generalizes, such that movements in novel situations are affected by previous training. It has been shown that the pattern of generalization for visuomotor rotation learning changes when training movements are made to a wide distribution of directions. Here we have found that for dynamics learning, the shape of the generalization gradient is not similarly modifiable by the extent of training within the workspace. Subjects learned to control a robotic device during training and we measured how subsequent movements in a reference direction were affected. Our results show that as the angular separation between training and test directions increased, the extent of generalization was reduced. When training involved multiple targets throughout the workspace, the extent of generalization was no greater than following training to the nearest target alone. Thus a wide range of experience compensating for a dynamics perturbation provided no greater benefit than localized training. Instead, generalization was complete when training involved targets that bounded the reference direction. This suggests that broad generalization of dynamics learning to movements in novel directions depends on interpolation between instances of localized learning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Tanaka, T. J. Sejnowski, and J. W. Krakauer Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotation Through Interaction Between Posterior Parietal and Motor Cortical Areas J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2921 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Darainy, A. A. G. Mattar, and D. J. Ostry Effects of Human Arm Impedance on Dynamics Learning and Generalization J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3158 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry Specificity of Speech Motor Learning J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2426 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]